Hi Guys,

I did not forget about you guys at all!  With the new firmware release , dealer inquires, and support calls I have been swamped.  I know the firmware update information was posted here already, so I won't go into those details.  The one part that I know all of you have noticed is IP control is listed as a future feature in a firmware update.  This is a really important step forward for integration into home/theater control.  Keep the faith, and realize HDI IS listening to the features requests they receive.  Sigma listed some interesting info on their page about the processors.

"•Use of iPhone® or iPod® touch devices to control the Blu-ray player"

I think that really sets the stage for what is really possible in the future.

Please feel free to leave questions here, and I will get here as often as I can.

Thanks
Mike
duneplayer.com

tigrzeye wrote:

Just a thought, but why not skip the timer completely and use a Programming Control Action delay of 3 minutes instead and see if it works.

When the Blu-Ray powers on
>Execute Scene '50% level'
>delay 3 minutes
>Execute Scene 'All Off'

just a thought on this approach.  i don't believe there is any way to "cancel" a delay.  so, if the user decides to bail on the BD (i.e. STOP, PAUSE, POWER OFF, etc.), the All Off scene is still going to execute.  (you could address this by putting an IF condition before executing the All Off that is tied to a flag variable, but that would start to make the code hard to manage.)

You currently can't cause page flips programmatically on Navigators, so you really can't do that in the current version.

You can do popups, but they're only showing a static image, not the live camera feed.

Sorry.

RyanE

My 7" wifi (1.8.2.5691) won't show some of the artwork on my DVD's, but does on screen. C4 Level III TS says "not sure". Luxul Wireless on Netgear WAP103, Apple Time Capsule Router, Pakedge Gig Switch. Network is stable as stable can be.

Sounds like a problem with the TV, AVR or a bad video input or cable. IF the C4 screen works, how could this be a C4 bug? Go over the signal path from the TV to the source, check all inputs, cables, connections.

how do you copy a screen shot?

Ilovec4 and well_armed, please do not post pics of yourselves in spandex.

I haven't had any problems.  I just saw on the specs that it only had 256MB of ram (I think, that's from memory) so I bought a 1 gig to throw in there just for kicks.

Still haven't done it...

Controlfouruserguy wrote:

My dealer just deals with me with a smile :)

He also gets to cash your check when the conversation is finished =)

You're using some of these Control4fouruserguy?

Neil, I wasn't kidding. I have never seen or heard of that, but it does look like it could be convenient in certain applications.

He is talking about using C4SOAP to send commands to Director over the network...

well_armed wrote:

bicycles? My moots compact custom....
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SV-StZbqvdw/S … Moots.jpg/

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SV-StZbqvdw/S … /Moots.jpg

Is that a Garmin 705?

So here it is.  Always late, but worth the wait.



It doesn't have the cool disconnect like the Moots, but it does weigh in at just under 15 lbs (with the computer, headlight and tailight but w/o the saddle bag).

I have an EX485 streaming music and video to my c4 media player. Works pretty well. Nothing special config wise, just created a user with read only access and had the installer use it during the install.

The server also backups 4 pcs and 1 imac.

dan wrote:

Yes this would definitely be awesome!  We have wanted to do this for a while, just have not had the employee resources to devote to such a project.

1.6 makes it extremely easy to have a 2 way IP control of a control4 system.  The secret for you would be to have the GUI auto generate itself without having to manually program anything.

i know this is an old thread, but i'm interesting in IP control of c4 and am not aware of an easy way to do this even through 1.8.  what method of IP control is this referring to?  (i know about IP drivers, but as far as i can tell it would be very kludgy to implement a gui this way.)