Jump to content
C4 Forums | Control4

SnapAV submits IPO draft to SEC to become public company--questions/concerns?


Recommended Posts


39 minutes ago, SMHarman said:

June 2019 they collapsed a listed company CTRL into snap.  

Why didn't they just reverse takeover back then. 

Because they didn't need to.  They got to manage the business away from the scrutiny of the public markets and the pressure of quarterly earnings.  Now they are attracted by the glut of institutional money looking for a home, the rise of SPAC capital etc.  The rise of home working and increasingly sophisticated tech consumers will be a narrative that helps them.  The threat of Apple, Amazon, Google and others will be a worry for investors.  And so on.

The S-1 doc isn't public yet.  That means they are doing the preliminaries at the moment.  Their investment bank and management will be having some fireside chats with funds, assessing the appetite, trying to price the stock etc.  No guarantee at this stage that the IPO will go ahead.

Also, remember that Snap AV is owned by Hellman & Friedman - a private equity fund that have only been in since 2017.  Depending on the fund parameters, a 4-5 year ownership is fairly routine.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SMHarman said:

June 2019 they collapsed a listed company CTRL into snap.  

Why didn't they just reverse takeover back then. 

So much easier to buy a public company as a private one than the other way around.... on top of the other reasons already listed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAV said:

The excuse will change, that is all. Instead of chip shortage, COVID the reps will go back to say can't talk about it, it's a public company. :)

Was this something that happened when contacting internal reps when they were a public company? Was before my C4 time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, tmj4 said:

Was this something that happened when contacting internal reps when they were a public company? Was before my C4 time...

Specifically they couldn't talk about things that hadn't happened yet.  Products that weren't released yet, acquisitions, etc due to insider trading restraints.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Don't see any downside. H&F is quality, so it's less relevant in this case, but I'd say public companies are more stable from a customer perspective (than PE-backed).

And man would I be a buyer at their go-private valuation. So much you could do with this business (even beyond the Snap vertical play, which was sharp)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.