Jump to content
C4 Forums | Control4

-defunct-

c4Forums Member
  • Posts

    822
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by -defunct-

  1. The old feature that was removed would not help with that either. You'll need to mirror your port up to the RK-1 and network switch and use wireshark.
  2. Network switch blocking sddp? System manager populates based on SDDP responses to an SDDP search.
  3. Explicit blocks are client based. Control4 does not have options to block explicit content.
  4. OvrC is a cloud service and configured via the cloud. No local configuration. You'll have to wait for your dealer.
  5. To verify, you can use system manager and connect to the controller, then go to the time tab and select Legacy. That should do one ntp request per day instead of the frequent checks. That would at least let you know if all of them are the reverse dns lookups for the ntp servers.
  6. Well, that's a nonexistent version, so...
  7. It should not be reaching out to Russian servers, but I would review the DNS requests as it might be the ntp server reverse lookup. My own system was pulling an NSA time server from that reverse lookup.
  8. Remotes check in while they sleep, so all you have to do is wait while the beep is sent.
  9. That driver does work actually... Pull up wireshark and filter by 'WOL'
  10. With programming after source selection, you'll need to add delays before your custom codes are executed so the entire system is finished processing the built-in commands otherwise you'll get a race condition of your code being sent before the built-in codes are executed. It's kinda clunky to do that via programming than project setup and driver connections.
  11. Each source device driver connects to an input on the TV and the system sends the TV the associated code for changing the input. You don't need to test anything in that regard, you just need the device driver added to the system and connected to the correct input on the TV driver. You can for sure send input commands to a TV via programming, but the connections will override it every source selection.
  12. HE was designed more to allow a home owner to add programming onto a functioning system such as making schedules, alerts, etc.
  13. That level of troubleshooting and configuration is exactly what an installer is supposed to do. I'm surprised they installed your system and left the TV half/nonfunctional...
  14. It's pretty reasonable to expect another generation of a device to exist at some point. The SR260 was around a long time, same with the sr250.
  15. Not exactly. It was more or less that it was ran as is to reduce any redevelopment costs. Plenty of employees had design feedback, including myself.
  16. Note about the Neeo, the design for that was predetermined by the Neeo team before acquisition. Control4 only increased memory and changed software.
  17. Some dealers are included in a panel to provide feedback, but it is limited and handled by the PMs. Control4 employees watch here, reddit, facebook, and a few other places and send back useful feedback or reports of issues, but it sounds like you're looking for a design feedback option and that is only taken by those in the limited panel.
  18. I would be weary of it being activated on OvrC because whoever has it in their account would have full access to your network if it is connected to the internet.
  19. Make sure the RK-1 is updated to the firmware version that is compatible with OvrC. The best way to take over OvrC devices is to utilize a Pro Hub. It has the option to remove all scanned devices from OvrC, so you can add them to your own site.
  20. Dealers will still be able to pull logs via system manager.
  21. Only method they are shared on the network is smb. I wouldn't invest much time into that as it is slated to be passworded instead of open.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.