Jump to content
C4 Forums | Control4

Araknis & Access Points


Cooper

Recommended Posts


In general terms, more or less every WiFi Access Point should work just fine with Araknis (or any other) router/switch setup with a few caveats:

-Some 'systems' ask for weird setup that may be a problem. Eero usually state to put the first wifi piece in between the router and any switch. Please don't. These are 'simple consumer' guidelines that bypass possible issue points for the walmart shoppers that are doing their own network (ie use crappy switches). It is poor proper network setup however.

-Watch with any AP setup that has an advanced interface. Nothging against the interface, but in some cases they offer more 'advanced' settings that can cause issue if similar settings are in place on existing routers/switches (Ruckus is one of them, Ubiquiti similarly so. Just take care and be aware of your router and switch settings

-Obviously a bad wifi/ap device won't magically work well because it's on a good switch..

-PoE, PoE+ (and PoE++ I suppose): When using PoE(+) Access Points, take note of your switch PoE capabilities as well as power budget.

 

 

Mesh wifi is a term often misused.

Technically a Mesh WiFi system is a system that uses extender/boosters to create coverage with a singular 'visual' SSID (name) for the end user (and the devices they use) to 'see'.

These are bad. Period. ANY use of extenders/boosters should be avoided unless truly impossible. To clarify, that would be any Access Point that is not hardwired to the main network and connects to that network wireless and then broadcasts a wireless signal for people to use. (Wireless bridges would not be included in this). 'Mesh' in that sense is just a s(somewhat) more advanced option than the old boosters that repeated a signal under a different name (ie name-EXT) and there may or may not be some level of handoff control/traffic control in place.

 

Often the term 'mesh' is used to describe setups that use multiple HARDWIRED Access Points to create coverage over a larger space. Similarly there is only one SSID visible to the user and their devices, and these offer a level of controlled hand-off between access points (the ability to roam without losing signal, getting a weak signal.

These systems are just fine (Araknis, Ruckus, Ubiquiti) as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you use RSTP instead of STP, you'll be fine. Also, it doesn't have PIM support (which affects VLAN's and autodiscovery mainly). If you're planning to do VLAN's or aren't competent with networking get what your installer tells you to purchase. Unifi works fine in standard cases

Access Networks / Ruckus however is generally considered the best option these days (but is expensive)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Carter Hobson said:

Has anyone had any issues using a full Unifi setup (Dream Machine, Switch, Access Points) with a Control4 System?

My Neeo's never worked reliably with my UniFi.  Other than that, no issues.  I have ~50 UniFi elements (a lot of them are 4-port mini switches behind 20 TVs), 18 WAPs, 10G backbone connecting 4 IT racks.  Lots of stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.